What could Brexit mean for rural businesses?

I should begin this post by stating that I was genuinely undecided right to the last minute but I voted “leave” on the basis that I feel our economy can prosper outside of the EU. Whether that was a wise decision will depend upon our political leaders’ responses and the actions of our businesses.  I should also add that this is a personal view and not necessarily the view of Lincoln International Business School.

So what opportunities are there for small rural businesses outside of the EU?

We have over 50% of the country who are willing to risk the economy to express their nationalistic views. With less than 12% of all UK business engaged in exporting, this could be seen as a real opportunity to promote “Buy British” and “Buy Local”.

If Sterling continues to fall, UK output will also be more competitive on world markets – especially those outside of the EU given that the Dollar has appreciated more strongly than the Euro. We already trade more profitably with the rest of the world so this gives businesses the opportunity to explore new niche markets and build relationships with emerging global powers.  For this to succeed, we need trade leaders to promote UK plc, to negotiate strong trade deals and to provide the right investment to support innovations and infrastructure.

Businesses will still have to comply with international and EU legislation for trading standards if we want to export but if you are not an exporting business, some of the red-tape should be removed by the UK government – although we will need strong lobby groups to make sure that this happens.

Farmers: it is unrealistic to expect the same level of subsidy outside of the EU. For tenant farmers, this could help to push for reductions in rents. For all farmers this should encourage strategic reviews of their activities.  Look at the New Zealand scenario since the removal of subsidies – they have a lot of enterprising rural business people combining food production with a range of other profitable activities.  The shock of subsidy withdrawal was not pleasant, but we have time to plan for a gradual reduction of subsidies and we can lobby for subsidies to be targeted towards those farm activities and products that are most in need of support.

More broadly, we need to lobby to retain a rural economy support programme but it is not hard to imagine that we can design something better than the European LEADER programme which is poorly resourced, bureaucratic and little known across rural England.

None of this will be easy, but anyone who has studied business, and especially Joseph Schumpeter’s theories of creative destruction, will know that change and uncertainty creates new spaces for innovation and new business opportunities. The challenge is to be a pro-active “creator” as those lagging behind the curve could face “destruction”.   And a free business idea for everyone – who will set up the first “Brexit Strategy Consultancy”?!!

Rural research: TARRN meets MICaRD

A great event at Queen’s University, Belfast, last week.  After 2 days of transatlantic rural research with the TARRN network , and a tour of Stormont, the new Migration, Inter-Connectivity and Regional Development (MICaRD) network was launched with a discussion about the challenges and opportunities associated with migrant worker in rural labour markets.  A note of the meeting will appear in Regions shortly but here is a sneak preview: Regions article may16

“Liveability” for rural development policy

Following a presentation to the CPRE‘s event on Lincolnshire’s rural economy on 1st March 2016, it was evident that there was some discontent with the way that “sustainable development” is being applied in local planning matter. Instead, this note offers some thoughts about the prospect for applying “liveability” as an alternative viewpoint.

A note on LivabilityCPRE event at Sleaford

 

I also attach the slides that I presented

at the event here:

CPRE Sleaford 

Brewing Beer and Pubs; a global perspective

Thanks for Ignazio Cabras, David Higgins and David Preece for all your efforts in editing this volume.  Thanks also to Claire Markham for doing most of the work on our chapter, “The village pub in the 21st Century: Embeddededness and the local”, accessible from our University repository: http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/.

In our chapter, we argue that “the local” as village pubs have traditionally been called, is increasingly having to serve a wider target audience and offer more diverse products and services to remain commercially viable.  Throughout the book, there is clear evidence that the brewing industry globally is seeing both a groundswell of new entrants and microbreweries at one end whilst the big firms are consolidating into fewer increasingly dominant global brands.  From the other chapters, it is interesting to see that the problem of “tied” pubs is not unique to the UK and also to learn that the fermentation of alcoholic drinks dates back some 7-9,000 years in China and perhaps a similar date in Mesopotamia.  Beer brewing itself  was also established in Egypt from about 5000BC.

The book can be purchased from the publishers, Palgrave: http://www.palgrave.com/gb/book/9781137466174#

You might also be interested in another paper that I have written with Victoria Ellis on Microbreweries in the UK which appears in the British Food Journal: Microbreweries paper for BFJ FINAL

CLA report on the diversity of rural economies

The CLA has produced a document entitled “standing up for rural businesses” that both highlights diversity of today’s rural economy and identifies opportunities for growth.  To fulfil the potential of our rural economies they call for universal broadband and mobile services, a planning system that unlocks investment, urgent steps to address the “housing crisis” in rural areas and an effective framework or rural development, which is currently very fragmented from the EU down to local policy levels.  A full report is due soon, but the summary report can be accessed here: https://www.cla.org.uk/node/7738

CLA rural business